Priyanka Shetty
Partner
MumbaiPractice Area
Sectors
I am passionate about the interplay of dispute resolution mechanisms, commerce and policy and would like to see more commercial disputes being referred to an effective arbitration process because that is our future. What intrigues me are out of the box solutions and the possibility to pivot large disputes with the smallest details.
Priyanka Shetty has notable expertise in investment treaty arbitrations and enforcement proceedings.
Legal 500 Asia–Pacific (2021)Priyanka Shetty has 15 years of experience and is part of the Firm’s Dispute Resolution team. Priyanka has advised and represented clients in investment treaty, domestic and international commercial arbitrations under the rules of all the major arbitral institutions. She also advises on complex commercial and corporate litigation, white collar crimes, insolvency disputes and regulatory matters. Her experience ranges across various sectors, including infrastructure projects, non-renewable and renewable energy, insurance and telecom.
WORK HIGHLIGHTS
-
In challenging and striking down the circular by the Reserve Bank of India which had inter alia directed lenders to refer loan accounts of over INR 2,000 crores to the bankruptcy process
-
On its winding up petition against SpiceJet Ltd, one of India’s leading airlines
-
In a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India, which distinguished between ‘seat’ and ‘venue’ of arbitration
-
On its dispute against Avitel Ltd, a landmark decision of the Supreme Court which involved nuanced issues of arbitrability and fraud
-
On its successful investment treaty claim against India and related proceedings in Indian courts
-
In a landmark Supreme Court decision in relation to the derivative action of a foreign company in India, forum non conveniens and beneficial interest under Indian law
-
In challenging and striking down the circular by the Reserve Bank of India which had inter alia directed lenders to refer loan accounts of over INR 2,000 crores to the bankruptcy process
-
On its winding up petition against SpiceJet Ltd, one of India’s leading airlines
-
In a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India, which distinguished between ‘seat’ and ‘venue’ of arbitration
-
On its dispute against Avitel Ltd, a landmark decision of the Supreme Court which involved nuanced issues of arbitrability and fraud
-
On its successful investment treaty claim against India and related proceedings in Indian courts
-
In a landmark Supreme Court decision in relation to the derivative action of a foreign company in India, forum non conveniens and beneficial interest under Indian law
-
In challenging and striking down the circular by the Reserve Bank of India which had inter alia directed lenders to refer loan accounts of over INR 2,000 crores to the bankruptcy process
-
On its winding up petition against SpiceJet Ltd, one of India’s leading airlines
-
In a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India, which distinguished between ‘seat’ and ‘venue’ of arbitration
-
On its dispute against Avitel Ltd, a landmark decision of the Supreme Court which involved nuanced issues of arbitrability and fraud
-
On its successful investment treaty claim against India and related proceedings in Indian courts
-
In a landmark Supreme Court decision in relation to the derivative action of a foreign company in India, forum non conveniens and beneficial interest under Indian law
-
In challenging and striking down the circular by the Reserve Bank of India which had inter alia directed lenders to refer loan accounts of over INR 2,000 crores to the bankruptcy process
-
On its winding up petition against SpiceJet Ltd, one of India’s leading airlines
-
In a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India, which distinguished between ‘seat’ and ‘venue’ of arbitration
-
On its dispute against Avitel Ltd, a landmark decision of the Supreme Court which involved nuanced issues of arbitrability and fraud
-
On its successful investment treaty claim against India and related proceedings in Indian courts
-
In a landmark Supreme Court decision in relation to the derivative action of a foreign company in India, forum non conveniens and beneficial interest under Indian law
-
In challenging and striking down the circular by the Reserve Bank of India which had inter alia directed lenders to refer loan accounts of over INR 2,000 crores to the bankruptcy process
-
On its winding up petition against SpiceJet Ltd, one of India’s leading airlines
-
In a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India, which distinguished between ‘seat’ and ‘venue’ of arbitration
-
On its dispute against Avitel Ltd, a landmark decision of the Supreme Court which involved nuanced issues of arbitrability and fraud
-
On its successful investment treaty claim against India and related proceedings in Indian courts
-
In a landmark Supreme Court decision in relation to the derivative action of a foreign company in India, forum non conveniens and beneficial interest under Indian law
-
In challenging and striking down the circular by the Reserve Bank of India which had inter alia directed lenders to refer loan accounts of over INR 2,000 crores to the bankruptcy process
-
On its winding up petition against SpiceJet Ltd, one of India’s leading airlines
-
In a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India, which distinguished between ‘seat’ and ‘venue’ of arbitration
-
On its dispute against Avitel Ltd, a landmark decision of the Supreme Court which involved nuanced issues of arbitrability and fraud
-
On its successful investment treaty claim against India and related proceedings in Indian courts
-
In a landmark Supreme Court decision in relation to the derivative action of a foreign company in India, forum non conveniens and beneficial interest under Indian law
-
In challenging and striking down the circular by the Reserve Bank of India which had inter alia directed lenders to refer loan accounts of over INR 2,000 crores to the bankruptcy process
-
On its winding up petition against SpiceJet Ltd, one of India’s leading airlines
-
In a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India, which distinguished between ‘seat’ and ‘venue’ of arbitration
-
On its dispute against Avitel Ltd, a landmark decision of the Supreme Court which involved nuanced issues of arbitrability and fraud
-
On its successful investment treaty claim against India and related proceedings in Indian courts
-
In a landmark Supreme Court decision in relation to the derivative action of a foreign company in India, forum non conveniens and beneficial interest under Indian law
-
In challenging and striking down the circular by the Reserve Bank of India which had inter alia directed lenders to refer loan accounts of over INR 2,000 crores to the bankruptcy process
-
On its winding up petition against SpiceJet Ltd, one of India’s leading airlines
-
In a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India, which distinguished between ‘seat’ and ‘venue’ of arbitration
-
On its dispute against Avitel Ltd, a landmark decision of the Supreme Court which involved nuanced issues of arbitrability and fraud
-
On its successful investment treaty claim against India and related proceedings in Indian courts
-
In a landmark Supreme Court decision in relation to the derivative action of a foreign company in India, forum non conveniens and beneficial interest under Indian law
-
In challenging and striking down the circular by the Reserve Bank of India which had inter alia directed lenders to refer loan accounts of over INR 2,000 crores to the bankruptcy process
-
On its winding up petition against SpiceJet Ltd, one of India’s leading airlines
-
In a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India, which distinguished between ‘seat’ and ‘venue’ of arbitration
-
On its dispute against Avitel Ltd, a landmark decision of the Supreme Court which involved nuanced issues of arbitrability and fraud
-
On its successful investment treaty claim against India and related proceedings in Indian courts
-
In a landmark Supreme Court decision in relation to the derivative action of a foreign company in India, forum non conveniens and beneficial interest under Indian law
-
In challenging and striking down the circular by the Reserve Bank of India which had inter alia directed lenders to refer loan accounts of over INR 2,000 crores to the bankruptcy process
-
On its winding up petition against SpiceJet Ltd, one of India’s leading airlines
-
In a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India, which distinguished between ‘seat’ and ‘venue’ of arbitration
-
On its dispute against Avitel Ltd, a landmark decision of the Supreme Court which involved nuanced issues of arbitrability and fraud
-
On its successful investment treaty claim against India and related proceedings in Indian courts
-
In a landmark Supreme Court decision in relation to the derivative action of a foreign company in India, forum non conveniens and beneficial interest under Indian law
-
In challenging and striking down the circular by the Reserve Bank of India which had inter alia directed lenders to refer loan accounts of over INR 2,000 crores to the bankruptcy process
-
On its winding up petition against SpiceJet Ltd, one of India’s leading airlines
-
In a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India, which distinguished between ‘seat’ and ‘venue’ of arbitration
-
On its dispute against Avitel Ltd, a landmark decision of the Supreme Court which involved nuanced issues of arbitrability and fraud
-
On its successful investment treaty claim against India and related proceedings in Indian courts
-
In a landmark Supreme Court decision in relation to the derivative action of a foreign company in India, forum non conveniens and beneficial interest under Indian law
RECENT RECOGNITION
2024
2023
2022
2021
Asialaw Profiles
‘Rising Star’ for Dispute Resolution
Benchmark Litigation Asia Pacific
Future Star of the Year
Benchmark Litigation Asia Pacific
Future Star of the Year
Legal 500 Asia Pacific
Recommended for Dispute Resolution (Arbitration)
Legal 500 Asia Pacific
Recommended for Dispute Resolution (Arbitration)
RECENT RECOGNITION
Asialaw Profiles
‘Rising Star’ for Dispute Resolution
Benchmark Litigation Asia Pacific
Future Star of the Year
Benchmark Litigation Asia Pacific
Future Star of the Year
Legal 500 Asia Pacific
Recommended for Dispute Resolution (Arbitration)
Legal 500 Asia Pacific
Recommended for Dispute Resolution (Arbitration)