Abhijnan Jha
Partner
DelhiPractice Area
Sectors
I am driven by my pursuit of excellence in the work that I do. Nothing motivates me more than the opportunity to resolve problems for my client.
Abhijnan Jha has 10 years of experience and specialises in Dispute Resolution. He advises and represents multinational clients in domestic/cross-border disputes in various courts including the Supreme Court of India and in a variety of arbitral forums. Abhijnan holds an LLM in commercial laws from the University of Cambridge. Abhijnan is also an Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court of India.
WORK HIGHLIGHTS
-
On customer disputes and on engagements with law enforcement
-
On its dispute with the Future Group where the Supreme Court of India recognized the validity of emergency arbitration in India
-
On various disputes relating to supply contracts
-
On ad-hoc arbitration proceedings against an India-based manufacturer of mobile phones
-
On disputes between its investee companies in Hyderabad, Chennai and certain minority shareholders on issues including the arbitrability of disputes which are raised in petitions alleging “oppression and mismanagement” under Section 241/242 of the Companies Act, 2013
-
On an enforcement action against an Indian energy company before the Delhi High Court to execute a consent arbitral award
-
On customer disputes and on engagements with law enforcement
-
On its dispute with the Future Group where the Supreme Court of India recognized the validity of emergency arbitration in India
-
On various disputes relating to supply contracts
-
On ad-hoc arbitration proceedings against an India-based manufacturer of mobile phones
-
On disputes between its investee companies in Hyderabad, Chennai and certain minority shareholders on issues including the arbitrability of disputes which are raised in petitions alleging “oppression and mismanagement” under Section 241/242 of the Companies Act, 2013
-
On an enforcement action against an Indian energy company before the Delhi High Court to execute a consent arbitral award
-
On customer disputes and on engagements with law enforcement
-
On its dispute with the Future Group where the Supreme Court of India recognized the validity of emergency arbitration in India
-
On various disputes relating to supply contracts
-
On ad-hoc arbitration proceedings against an India-based manufacturer of mobile phones
-
On disputes between its investee companies in Hyderabad, Chennai and certain minority shareholders on issues including the arbitrability of disputes which are raised in petitions alleging “oppression and mismanagement” under Section 241/242 of the Companies Act, 2013
-
On an enforcement action against an Indian energy company before the Delhi High Court to execute a consent arbitral award
-
On customer disputes and on engagements with law enforcement
-
On its dispute with the Future Group where the Supreme Court of India recognized the validity of emergency arbitration in India
-
On various disputes relating to supply contracts
-
On ad-hoc arbitration proceedings against an India-based manufacturer of mobile phones
-
On disputes between its investee companies in Hyderabad, Chennai and certain minority shareholders on issues including the arbitrability of disputes which are raised in petitions alleging “oppression and mismanagement” under Section 241/242 of the Companies Act, 2013
-
On an enforcement action against an Indian energy company before the Delhi High Court to execute a consent arbitral award
-
On customer disputes and on engagements with law enforcement
-
On its dispute with the Future Group where the Supreme Court of India recognized the validity of emergency arbitration in India
-
On various disputes relating to supply contracts
-
On ad-hoc arbitration proceedings against an India-based manufacturer of mobile phones
-
On disputes between its investee companies in Hyderabad, Chennai and certain minority shareholders on issues including the arbitrability of disputes which are raised in petitions alleging “oppression and mismanagement” under Section 241/242 of the Companies Act, 2013
-
On an enforcement action against an Indian energy company before the Delhi High Court to execute a consent arbitral award
-
On customer disputes and on engagements with law enforcement
-
On its dispute with the Future Group where the Supreme Court of India recognized the validity of emergency arbitration in India
-
On various disputes relating to supply contracts
-
On ad-hoc arbitration proceedings against an India-based manufacturer of mobile phones
-
On disputes between its investee companies in Hyderabad, Chennai and certain minority shareholders on issues including the arbitrability of disputes which are raised in petitions alleging “oppression and mismanagement” under Section 241/242 of the Companies Act, 2013
-
On an enforcement action against an Indian energy company before the Delhi High Court to execute a consent arbitral award
-
On customer disputes and on engagements with law enforcement
-
On its dispute with the Future Group where the Supreme Court of India recognized the validity of emergency arbitration in India
-
On various disputes relating to supply contracts
-
On ad-hoc arbitration proceedings against an India-based manufacturer of mobile phones
-
On disputes between its investee companies in Hyderabad, Chennai and certain minority shareholders on issues including the arbitrability of disputes which are raised in petitions alleging “oppression and mismanagement” under Section 241/242 of the Companies Act, 2013
-
On an enforcement action against an Indian energy company before the Delhi High Court to execute a consent arbitral award
-
On customer disputes and on engagements with law enforcement
-
On its dispute with the Future Group where the Supreme Court of India recognized the validity of emergency arbitration in India
-
On various disputes relating to supply contracts
-
On ad-hoc arbitration proceedings against an India-based manufacturer of mobile phones
-
On disputes between its investee companies in Hyderabad, Chennai and certain minority shareholders on issues including the arbitrability of disputes which are raised in petitions alleging “oppression and mismanagement” under Section 241/242 of the Companies Act, 2013
-
On an enforcement action against an Indian energy company before the Delhi High Court to execute a consent arbitral award
-
On customer disputes and on engagements with law enforcement
-
On its dispute with the Future Group where the Supreme Court of India recognized the validity of emergency arbitration in India
-
On various disputes relating to supply contracts
-
On ad-hoc arbitration proceedings against an India-based manufacturer of mobile phones
-
On disputes between its investee companies in Hyderabad, Chennai and certain minority shareholders on issues including the arbitrability of disputes which are raised in petitions alleging “oppression and mismanagement” under Section 241/242 of the Companies Act, 2013
-
On an enforcement action against an Indian energy company before the Delhi High Court to execute a consent arbitral award
-
On customer disputes and on engagements with law enforcement
-
On its dispute with the Future Group where the Supreme Court of India recognized the validity of emergency arbitration in India
-
On various disputes relating to supply contracts
-
On ad-hoc arbitration proceedings against an India-based manufacturer of mobile phones
-
On disputes between its investee companies in Hyderabad, Chennai and certain minority shareholders on issues including the arbitrability of disputes which are raised in petitions alleging “oppression and mismanagement” under Section 241/242 of the Companies Act, 2013
-
On an enforcement action against an Indian energy company before the Delhi High Court to execute a consent arbitral award
-
On customer disputes and on engagements with law enforcement
-
On its dispute with the Future Group where the Supreme Court of India recognized the validity of emergency arbitration in India
-
On various disputes relating to supply contracts
-
On ad-hoc arbitration proceedings against an India-based manufacturer of mobile phones
-
On disputes between its investee companies in Hyderabad, Chennai and certain minority shareholders on issues including the arbitrability of disputes which are raised in petitions alleging “oppression and mismanagement” under Section 241/242 of the Companies Act, 2013
-
On an enforcement action against an Indian energy company before the Delhi High Court to execute a consent arbitral award
RECENT RECOGNITION
2025
2024
2023
2022
Legal 500 Asia Pacific
Recommended for Dispute Resolution (Arbitration)
Legal 500 Asia Pacific
Recommended for Dispute Resolution (Litigation)
Legal 500 Asia Pacific
Recommended for Dispute Resolution (Litigation)
Legal 500 Asia Pacific
Recommended for Dispute Resolution (Litigation & Arbitration)
RECENT RECOGNITION
Legal 500 Asia Pacific
Recommended for Dispute Resolution (Arbitration)
Legal 500 Asia Pacific
Recommended for Dispute Resolution (Litigation)
Legal 500 Asia Pacific
Recommended for Dispute Resolution (Litigation)
Legal 500 Asia Pacific
Recommended for Dispute Resolution (Litigation & Arbitration)