Driven by excellence, focused on strategies for the longer term.

This is the crux of who we are. It is an articulation of precision in purpose, from the Firm’s beginnings to where we are today. Our collective eye is unerringly trained on tomorrow.

Deep sectoral expertise across services and industries.

Our insistence on strategic advisory exacts an in-depth understanding of and involvement with our clients’ businesses and industries. We engage not just individual businesses, but also contribute to the country’s legal and regulatory frameworks.

Personal commitment supported by experience and grit.

We commit early. We pull together internally for greater support. Every effort is sincere, every individual deeply dedicated to their task, their role, to the Firm.

Our undertakings for long-term impact are an organic extension of our purpose.

They are to employ our deep knowledge of the law beyond the business, the transaction, the deal. To use the opportunities and skills we possess, to reflect on the culture we’re creating. Individually and collectively, these are our efforts to help shape the thinking of our future generations, and arm them with strategies for true, sustainable growth.

Knowledge-sharing is intrinsic to equity and inclusivity.

This is a repository of thought leadership, deep insights and strong viewpoints, legal and other news and events and how they impact the industry and our clients.

Relevance is critical to growth. It necessitates a firm that is dynamic and responsive.

Amplifying intrinsic talent, sharpening skills, expanding knowledge, is vital to leading. It defines every aspect of how our firm functions and transacts. This is how we create new benchmarks and set industry standards.

  • Connect
Jul 23, 2024

SC Clarifies that ED Cannot Arrest Accused After Special Court has Taken Cognizance of Complaint under PMLA

The SC in the case of Tarsem Lal v. Enforcement Directorate[1], held that the Enforcement Directorate (‘ED’) cannot arrest an accused after a Special Court has taken cognizance of a complaint alleging money laundering. Once cognizance is taken, indicating that the investigation is complete and the case is ready for trial, the ED cannot arrest an accused, as the accused would be within the jurisdiction of the Special Court dealing with the complaint.

The SC further held that when an accused furnishes a bond for appearance before a Special Court, he agrees and undertakes to appear before the Special Court regularly and punctually and on his default, he agrees to pay the amount mentioned in the bond. Therefore, an order accepting bonds from the accused does not amount to a grant of bail and thus, would not involve application of the conditions laid down in Section 45(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (‘PMLA’) for grant of bail.

[1] Tarsem Lal v. Enforcement Directorate, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 971.

TAGS

SHARE

Subscribe

DISCLAIMER

These are the views and opinions of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Firm. This article is intended for general information only and does not constitute legal or other advice and you acknowledge that there is no relationship (implied, legal or fiduciary) between you and the author/AZB. AZB does not claim that the article's content or information is accurate, correct or complete, and disclaims all liability for any loss or damage caused through error or omission.

RELATED READING

Inter Alia

Direction to Access Service Providers for Submission of Details of Base Stations

Jul 23, 2024 | Technology Media and Telecommunication
Inter Alia

Stock Exchanges to be Recognised as Supervisory Bodies of Research Analysts and Investment Advisor

Jul 23, 2024 | Capital Markets Regulatory & Securities
Inter Alia

SC Refers Question on Whether Time Barred Debts Can be Recovered Through Remedies Other than Civil Suits

Jul 23, 2024 | Dispute Resolution